Vietcong 2 wouldnt start?

Question

I downloaded Vietcong 2. I needed a no cd exe patch. I installed it replaced the 2 .exe files that i needed to, then i clicked on the desktop shortcut. There was a set up and i clicked ok, then nothing happened. What do i do i really want to play this game, i have Vietcong 1 and it works fine but 2 wouldnt start. Oh i did buy it, i downloaded it so i still needed the no CD exe patch. What can i do to fix it.

Answer 1

pirating software is illegal...



plus what does this have to do with land line telephones?

Answer 2

your premise is lacking one ingredient: if we (US) did not have preeminant militia rigidity. it quite is basic to ascribe morality to the geopolitical conflict. it is likewise a slippery slope falllacy. the subject is that maximum pundits and politicians use morally charged language while they impart with the time-honored public/ mob. i'm an American, i won't reconcile morality with rules previous or modern-day (for us or different states), those rules do, regardless of the undeniable fact that make experience if the beginning place is interest. The variety i exploit while observing diplomacy is severe college. as a results of fact the "cool" little ones have been able to act a definite way according to their status and the "geeks" have been greater constrained, in an attempt to can we see constraints on state habit. in short, states behave according to their status interior the international community. subsequently, the U. S. has severely greater freedom to function and justify its acts as a results of its militia and cultural hegemony, the absence of which severely limits a rustic like Bolivia. correct and incorrect are fairly not area of the equation, it fairly is interest in the present day and it's always so the next day. If the U. S. lost its place of preeminance, then confident, it might actual motel to assymetric conflict. yet to be taken aback that a state with preeminant means would leverage that means to apply the international device is somewhat stupid. that's what (all hegemonic) states do, calling it imperialism or not is basically debating a label that has little consequence on the habit itself. the U. S. leverages its means and the subsequent perfect rigidity will do the comparable, that's not something new.